Yom HaShoah and the importance of recognizing when the rules of the game have changed

Many people have wondered (as did I, when I was younger) why Jewish communities under National Socialist tyranny didn’t react (sooner) with armed resistance. (Individuals and smaller Jewish groups did, of course.) Contrary to what some people mistakenly assume, Judaism is not a pacifist religion, and the idea of meekly accepting one’s fate at the hands of one’s killers is not some sort of Jewish ideal.

Raul Hilberg, the doyen of Shoah historians, sees this very differently in “The Destruction of the European Jews”, (3rd Edition, Yale University Press, 2003, pp. 25-27). In response to “garden variety” oppressors, the Jewish community developed and honed an adaptive response over many centuries that ultimately relied on the oppressor’s self-interest: make them “not slaughter the goose that lays the golden eggs for them”.

[…] The alleviation-compliance response dates, as we have seen, to pre-Christian times. It has its beginnings with the Jewish philosophers and historians Philo and Josephus, who bargained on behalf of Jewry with the Romans and who cautioned the Jews not to attack, in word or deed, any other people. The Jewish reaction pattern assured the survival of Jewry during the Church’s massive conversion drive. The Jewish policy once more assured to the embattled community a foothold and a chance for survival during the periods of expulsion and exclusion.

If, therefore, the Jews have always played along with an attacker, they have done so with deliberation and calculation, in the knowledge that their policy would result in least damage and least injury. The Jews knew that measures of destruction were self-financing or even profitable up to a certain point but that beyond that limit they could be costly. As one historian put it: ‘‘One does not kill the cow one wants to milk.’’ In the Middle Ages the Jews carried out vital economic functions. Precisely in the usury so much complained of by Luther and his contemporaries, there was an important catalyst for the development of a more complex economic system. In modern times, too, Jews have pioneered in trade, in the professions, and in the arts. Among some Jews the conviction grew that Jewry was ‘‘indispensable.’’

In the early 1920s Hugo Bettauer wrote a fantasy novel entitled Die Stadt ohne Juden (The City without Jews).50 This highly significant novel, published only eleven years before Hitler came to power, depicts an expulsion of the Jews from Vienna. The author shows how Vienna cannot get along without its Jews. Ultimately, the Jews are recalled. That was the mentality of Jewry, and of Jewish leadership, on the eve of the destruction process. When the Nazis took over in 1933, the old Jewish reaction pattern set in again, but this time the results were catastrophic. The German bureaucracy was not slowed by Jewish pleading; it was not stopped by Jewish indispensability. Without regard to cost, the bureaucratic machine, operating with accelerating speed and ever-widening destructive effect, proceeded to annihilate the European Jews. The Jewish community, unable to switch to resistance, increased its cooperation with the tempo of the German measures, thus hastening its own destruction.

In sum, both perpetrators and victims drew upon their age-old experience in dealing with each other. The [Nazis] did it with success. The Jews did it with disaster.

Outside the immediate context of the Shoah, in a broader sense, it boils down to the importance of recognizing when the rules of the game have fundamentally changed, and therefore the old, tried-and-true, approach not only no longer can be expected to work, but clinging to it will be disastrous.

UPDATE: Jeff Dunetz at “Yid With Lid” has Gen. Eisenhower’s historic responses to the horror he was witnessing during the liberation of the camps. https://lidblog.com/yom-hashoah-holocaust-remembrance/

9 thoughts on “Yom HaShoah and the importance of recognizing when the rules of the game have changed

  1. Yeah, this was one of the things that really ingrained in me the importance of trying to truly see, and to think about when it is time to leave.

    I don’t, at this point, have any where to run to.

    I think realizing the more general sense of ‘never again’ is a really difficult goal. Doesn’t mean that the effort isn’t worth it.

    • Those fleeing Europe came to an America that had the strength to protect them. There is no place to go that will not fold and hand you over to feed the alligator.

    • Having no place to which to flee is one of the purposes of world government.

      US Vietnam-era draft dodger fleeing to Canada? No: Canada might exist but it would no longer be sovereign: it would turn draft dodgers over to the Proper Authorities.

      Violate the anti-blasphemy laws. Too bad: the US will extradite the culprit.

      Defy the WHO directive? No place to hide.

    • People mostly forget that greed, envy, and hatred* will periodically overcome rational self-interest and love of one’s fellow man. No matter how much Jews contribute, and “go along to get along,” sooner or later they will be targeted by people they thought were their allies. Bill DeBlasio; need I say more?

      What saddens me is that American Jews insist on remaining in big blue cities where they are targets of violent crime and ignored by local governments. Why put your kids through all that? All you need to live a safer, healthier life is some research into people’s values, and a U-Haul truck.

      I vehemently disagree with Sunny Day above. In my working-class, rednecky town, ain’t nobody gettin’ handed over.

      * James Baldwin’s essay in the NYT is illuminating.

  2. If independent countries like Poland and France couldn’t resist the Nazis with armed resistance, why expect Jews, a people without a country or an army, to do it? The Jewish cultural strategy described above (become valuable) was both appropriate and appropriately measured for WWII: the Nazis vastly exceeded the bounds of normalcy and the Jews responded by fleeing, inventing atomic weapons, and arming the good guys with them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s