Esperanto and Interlingua: two very different IALs

Scifi- and fantasy geekdom is familiar with the phenomenon of conlangs (constructed languages) such as Klingon — often created out of whole cloth.

An “international auxiliary language” (IAL) is a different type of conlang: based on existing languages, to be used not instead of national (or ethnic) languages but as a means of interlinguistic communication — as a lingua franca, so to speak, but one that wasn’t already anyone’s national language. (Once upon a time, Latin was the lingua franca of scholars; then French became that of diplomacy; and ultimately English proved irresistible.)

The Polish-Jewish ophtalmologist and amateur linguist Ludvik Leiser Zamenhof (Leiser is the Yiddish version of Hebrew Eliezer=G-d [is] help — what’s in a name?) was born in Bialystok and grew up frustrated by the many quarrels between different ethnic groups (Jews, Poles, Russians, Belarusians, ethnic Germans,…) and wistfully dreamed of a common language between them that would eliminate or at least reduce misunderstandings. (Cynic’s note: Serbs and Croats understood each other perfectly well. It did nothing to stop the butchery in former Yugoslavia.)

This dream stayed with him as he moved to Warsaw during his high school years. Even then he started dabbling with the project that would eventually become Esperanto. His parents spoke Russian and Yiddish, while he acquired Polish at school as well as learned German, in addition to passive Hebrew, French, and Latin.

His first published linguistic foray was a grammar of Yiddish. After medical school, he practiced in various towns, including Vienna where he had stimulating discussions about his project. Ultimately, with financial support from his future father-in-law, in 1997 he published a book in Russian with a title that translates as “International language: Introduction and complete textbook”, for which he used the pen name “Doktor Esperanto” (Dr. Hopeful, cf. esperanza in Spanish and espoir in French.) He would later write textbooks in Esperanto itself, as well as translate major works of world literature into his constructed language.

Paul of LangFocus just posted a great overview video of the language here:

Some basic design features:

  • simple and extremely regular grammar (essentially no exceptions)
  • vocabulary of mostly Romance origin, but with substantial Germanic influence
  • written in the 26 letters of the Latin alphabet, plus six accented letters
  • designed to be easy to learn

The joke goes that at the coffee break at the first Esperanto congress, participants would greet each other with “Vos macht a yid?” [Lterally: “How’s a Jew doing”, idiomatically: “How are you?” or “What’s up?”]

In childhood, I ran into a number of Esperanto enthusiasts, but never was able to understand why anyone would bother to learn a constructed language mastered by relatively few people, when a rich alternative spoken with hundreds of millions of native speakers (and over a billion others with some proficiency) was available. Over time, I found myself having to teach my graduate students the fundamentals and finer points of scientific communication and got to explain (sometimes maddeningly irregular, at other times obsessive) features of the English language that I had long ago learned to apply on autopilot. I realized then just how true is the saying “easy to learn, but takes a lifetime to master” about English.

I still would prefer to deepen my knowledge of living languages over learning a constructed language, but there are days where I edit or referee a paper in atrocious pseudo-English and wonder “wouldn’t it be nice of this were written in Esperanto or Interlingua instead?”

Which brings me to Interlingua. Its oldest incarnation was proposed by the Italian mathematician Giuseppe Peano [as in “Peano kernels”] as effectively “Latine sine inflexione” — scholarly Latin but without its complex grammar. Its goals were more limited than those of Esperanto — international scholarly communication. [At the time, leading scholarly journals were published in French, Russian, and especially German, besides English.]

The modern version was developed in the USA between 1936 and 1951 by an “International Auxiliary Language Association” founded and bankrolled by a heiress to the Vanderbilt fortune and her husband. The original goal may have been broader, but eventually it developed into not so much an IAL as an Inter-Romance Auxiliary Language. The video below gives an overview of Interlingua in… Interlingua, and to my surprise I understood every word. This is not surprising once you learn that a word is adopted if it exists in at least three of the following four: 1. French; 2. Italian; 3. English, and 4. Spanish and/or Portuguese. (The inc

  • if a word exists in at least three out

It is not so much a new conlang, one might argue, but an attempt to recreate “vulgar Latin” (the ancestor of all Romance languages, plus its “bastard grandchild” English ;)) in a highly regularized form.

Breaking: US Supreme Court rules 6-3 that reverse racism, er, “affirmative action” in college admissions is unconstitutional

Insty already has comments on the ruling (full text of which here https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/2023SCOTUSAFFIRMATIVE.pdf). Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissented. Emphasis mine in the following.

https://instapundit.substack.com/p/affirmative-actions-demise-and-higher/comments

Media accounts I’ve seen have tended to suggest that the Supreme Court had [in the past] found that “diversity” is a compelling interest, sufficient to justify overriding the Constitution’s ban on racial discrimination. For example, the Wall Street Journal’s report stated: “For 45 years, the Supreme Court has recognized a limited exception to that rule for university admissions, one based on the schools’ academic freedom to assemble classes that support their educational mission. Diversity was a compelling interest, the court had found.”

But the Supreme Court did not itself find that diversity was a compelling interest. Rather, it deferred to universities’ claims that diversity was a compelling interest. A court defers to someone else when it says that it may have a different opinion on the matter itself but it will allow the opinion of the person or entity in question to control because of their expertise. So, for example, under the now moribund doctrine of Chevrondeference, the Court would defer to an agency’s interpretation of the statute it administers, even if the Court would have interpreted the statute differently.

Deferring to an agency or a university on the question of what policies best serve a compelling interest is one thing; deferring on the question of what constitutes a compelling interest is another, much bigger, thing. But that is what the Court has done up to now.

But no longer. As the majority opinion today noted: “The universities’ main response to these criticisms is ‘trust us.’ They assert that universities are owed deference when using race to benefit some applicants but not others. While this Court has recognized a “tradition of giving a degree of deference to a university’s academic decisions,” it has made clear that deference must exist ‘within constitutionally prescribed limits.’”

“Trust us” was essentially the argument offered by the University of Michigan in Grutter [v. Bollinger], and one that was cheerfully accepted by the majority there. Not so much today.

But who trusts higher education anymore? At the turn of the millennium, when Grutter was decided, American higher ed was at its zenith. Since then a series of scandals – just today a famous “ethicist” at Harvard was charged with fraudulent ethics research – has undermined its reputation for probity (and the Hollywood admissions scandal of a few years back certainly undermined the perceived integrity of its admissions process), even as everything else about universities came to seem less serious. With 57 genders, coloring books and crying rooms for election results, endless crusades against “whiteness” and “heterosexism,” and the like, the notion of deferring to the educational seriousness and expertise of those in charge of the asylums of higher ed seemed much less appealing.

[…] So, regardless of what happens with affirmative action – lots of lying and dodging by schools, lots of civil rights lawsuits by plaintiffs is my prediction – I think a larger prediction is that higher education will in general enjoy less favorable judicial treatment in the future than it has enjoyed over the past century or so. If so, it will have no one to blame but itself.

ADDENDUM: Tom Knighton weighs in. https://tomknighton.substack.com/p/scotus-makes-the-right-call-on-affirmative

Hahvahd considers it a “hard day” when present discrimination against Asians to compensate blacks for past discrimination by whites is judged unconstitutional.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/today-is-a-hard-day-harvard-responds-to-supreme-court-affirmative-action-loss/

I am heading to our campus’s nanolithography facility to make an appropriately sized violin.

All the world’s a stage: what next for Prigozhin; “whiny grifters” Spare & Me-Again; Germany’s soft-authoritarian green push fueling a far-right resurgence; Canadian energy policies less woke than the “Conservative” UK government’s?

Catching up on the Daily Telegraph this moning, I was reminded time and again of the Bard’s famous dictum.

(a) James Kilner argues here that Prigozhin’s “March on Moscow” was actually meant as a publicity stunt, but ran out of hand when his subordinates really wanted a coup — and thus he shut it down. (“Masgramondou” earlier left a story in the comments that argued much the same thing.)

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/27/yevgeny-prigozhin-vladimir-putin-exile/

His private jet left Rostov, the Russian city of one million people that he captured on Saturday, and landed in Belarus – and Russia’s intelligence services said that they had dropped a criminal case against him. It’s caused alarm in Baltic states, as Latvia and Lithuania have called for Nato to strengthen its eastern borders in case they become targets as this suspected war criminal takes shelter nearby. 

[…] For all the Prigozhin patriarch’s experience in the Wagner group, he was an accidental coup leader. His rebellion fizzled out on Saturday evening with his fighters only 120 miles from Moscow when he realised that he had overplayed his hand.

What was supposed to have been an eye-catching stunt by Prigozhin to raise the profile of his Wagner mercenary group, which he loves, and to undermine the Russian Ministry of Defence, which he hates, has destroyed him and humiliated Vladimir Putin, the man he loyally served for 25 years as a sort of super-fixer. His friendship with Putin, the most valuable asset a Russian official can have, has been smashed forever. This rebellion was just supposed to be the media-savvy former restaurateur’s biggest headline-grabber yet. 

[…]

Prigozhin may have felt compelled to trigger his “March of Justice”, as he called it, on Friday evening because the Kremlin had ordered Russian mercenaries to subvert themselves to the military by July 1, a humiliating and inconceivable act for Wagner. The plan was to march on Rostov, trigger a standoff with the Russian army and then open negotiations which he hoped would discredit Sergei Shoigu, Russia’s Minister of Defence, and Valery Gerasimov, the head of the military.

Prigozhin has picked various fights with members of the Russian elite but his most vicious is with Shoigu. Snarling with barely contained rage in videos, set in destroyed and blood-soaked Bakhmut, Prigozhin has called Shoigu lazy, a cowardly grandpa, incompetent. He feels that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has failed because of Shoigu and that thousands of Russian soldiers died unnecessarily.

The plan was never to challenge Putin for power, as Prigozhin admitted on Monday, two days after the end of the rebellion. He didn’t want a fight. He just wanted publicity.

“We did not want to shed Russian blood,” he said in an audio message posted on the Telegram app, although Wagner did shoot down several attack helicopters. “We went to demonstrate and not to overthrow the government.”

But events appear to have run out of Prigozhin’s control from the start. Wagner fighters crossed into Russia without any resistance and within a couple of hours had walked into Rostov, which hosts the headquarters of the Russian Army’s southern division, virtually unmolested.

Prigozhin, a hardcore loyalist, had become the first man to capture a Russian city from the Kremlin since Chechen rebels took Grozny in the mid-1990s. He’d become an enemy of the state, whether he liked it or not.

Cue Putin’s speech on Saturday morning denouncing Prigozhin as a traitor and calling for him to be “brutally punished”. With enthusiastic heavily-armed Wagner fighters speeding north towards Moscow and the Russian army putting up limited resistance, Putin believed that Prigozhin wanted to seize power from him. And this scared Prigozhin who realised that he had pushed his luck too far.

A battle for Moscow was out of the question. He phoned the Kremlin to negotiate a way out.

Phillips O’Brien, professor of Strategic Studies at St Andrew’s University, said that Prigozhin’s stunt had simply spiralled out of control. “This was an attempt by Prigozhin to flex his muscles and protect his assets,” he said. “It got out of hand because the Putinist state is so weak.”

(b) Hilarous article by Allison Pearson on the “whiny grifters” Spare and Me-Again: “Finally, America sees Harry and Meghan for what they are: workshy, whining and thoroughly entitled”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/columnists/2023/06/27/harry-meghan-workshy-entitled/

In the UK, Meghan and Harry’s royal status might still have commanded respectful treatment (despite what they say about the tabloids). Not in LA. “F—ing grifters,” is what Bill Simmons, a Spotify executive, called the couple after the streaming giant pulled out of its $20 million (£15.7 million) deal with them after just one series. Simmons, who is head of podcast innovation and monetisation, did rather blow a hole in the “mutually agreed to part ways” story. On his own podcast, the splendidly frank Simmons said, “I have got to get drunk one night and tell the story of the Zoom I had with Harry to try and help him with a podcast idea. It’s one of my best stories … F— them. The grifters.”

Grifters is an American term which roughly translates as scroungers out to make a fast buck. As I learned when I was on my marathon US book tour (23 cities in 25 days), the one thing Americans dislike more than a grifter is a “whiner”. Even those with good cause for complaint are wary of appearing “whiny”. It looks ungrateful and Americans are very hot on gratitude. (Note, even the biggest names always take care to say how grateful they are for the oppordunidee.) Somehow, the Sussexes have pulled off the disastrous double-whammy of being whiny grifters.

[…]

One of the entertainment industry’s most powerful figures, Jeremy Zimmer, chief executive of United Talent Agency, piled into the growing censure this week, saying he was not surprised by Spotify’s decision. “Turns out Meghan Markle was not a great audio talent, or necessarily any kind of talent,” he told the news website Semafor in Cannes. “Just because you’re famous doesn’t make you great at something.”

Ouch! Such nicks and cuts to the couple’s reputation create blood in the water and, before long, the sharks start circling. More damning stories emerge. According to the Wall Street Journal, Taylor Swift got an aide to reject an invitation to appear on Archetypes, calligraphed in Meghan’s own fair hand. Who knows, maybe Taylor, who made her first recording aged 15 and is now worth the best part of $1 billion, didn’t feel it was appropriate for her to bitch with marry-into-a-fortune Meghan about “the labels that hold women back”.

An author, also invited to be a guest on Meghan’s podcast, said that when she arrived she was interviewed by a producer. She didn’t speak to Meghan; never even met her. Allegedly, the recording was then “edited” with the Duchess’s voice spliced in to pretend she had carried out the interview herself. How rude, how utterly lacking in class. Apparently, this experience was not unusual. Meghan would only have “conversations” with the most famous guests.

Well, what do you expect from a woman who, during a royal tour of Australia, is said to have moaned, “I can’t believe I’m not getting paid for this.” (All the poor thing got was a £32 million wedding and an ancient title to flex like a Platinum Reserve card.)

Add to that the rumoured “brainstorming” session with Harry in which the Duke suggested he should interview big names like Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump to talk about their childhood traumas and the effect it had on their mental health. Thereby improving “world peace”. Of course, this presumes that Prince Harry has a brain to storm in the first place.

[…]

The Sussexes’ deal with Netflix runs until 2025, but the Wall Street Journal talks ominously about a “graveyard of video projects that were never made”. Corporations which have handed over vast sums are “underwhelmed” by their lack of productivity. The couple are said to have “struggled to make content beyond their own experiences”, the paper claims.

Well, yes, obviously. Trapped in a velvet-padded echo chamber, Meghan and Harry have a hard time grasping that anything exists beyond their own privileged experiences. Denied the deference that was once theirs to command, they now stand cruelly exposed as workshy and entitled in both senses. Allegations of racism and tantrummy flouncing out won’t rescue the situation in the US. The sharks scent blood. The royal credit card is maxxed out. Ginge and Whinge are in trouble.

All the world’s indeed a stage

And we are merely players

Performers and portrayers

Each another’s audience, outside the gilded cage

Living in the limelight, the universal dream

For those who wish to seem

Those who wish to be

Must put aside the alienation

Get on with the fascination

The real relation

The underlying theme

Though for H&M, instead of Rush’s “Limelight”, Tool’s “Eulogy” is more appropriate:

He’s got a lot to say

He’s got a lot of nothing to say

[…]

Get off your f***ing cross

We need the space

To nail the next toolmotherfool martyr

(c) And read this one in its entirety. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/27/germany-is-headed-for-a-political-meltdown/ (paywalled; cached copy). Completely beholden to his Green [Hell] coalition partners, Social-Democrat Chancellor Olaf Scholz pushed disastrous energy policies on his population and now finds… the far-right AfD (Alternative for Germany) — a broad tent ranging from national conservatives to truly rancid NS nostalgists — polls neck and neck with his own SPD for second party status. (The largest bloc continues to be the CDU — Christian-Democratic Union — with its Bavarian sister party the CSU, or Christian-Social Union.)

Hand-wring about “resurgence of fascism” all you want, Scholz: you’ve been putting out the fire with gasoline.

Again, all the world is a stage. Also when the nominally “Conservative” government of “Dishy Rishi” Sunak is, on energy policy, actually outflanked on the right by… Poutine Castreau!

There are many reasons why Canada is booming, but one is fracking, which has been outlawed here. Far from loosening rules, Labour is planning a complete ban on new licences for conventional drilling in the North Sea should it come to power next year. 

Canada has developed a successful shale gas sector – it was the first country outside the US to see large-scale development of shale resources. 

It has long provided support to the oil and gas industry. Indeed, investment in the industry is expected to rise by another 11pc this year, according to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, and demand is still high. 

Calls for a windfall tax last year, meanwhile, were immediately rejected by Trudeau’s government for fear they would do more harm than good. Such arguments were dismissed in Britain, which now has a headline tax rate on North Sea oil and gas of 75pc. Investment has fallen, career opportunities gone. Offshore Energies UK have warned that Labour’s ban would lead to 45,000 job losses and a 60pc drop in domestic production. 

While the commitment is certainly there to combat climate change – indeed, their government seemingly never misses an opportunity to sign up to the newest target at the latest global conference – it perhaps is more realistic than we are here. 

Only a couple of areas are attempting to mandate heat pumps. While Canada is aiming to achieve a net-zero economy by 2050, it has so far taken a less cavalier attitude towards imposing extreme costs on businesses and households. 

Perhaps its government has in mind estimates that Canada’s natural gas production would plunge by 37pc-68pc by 2050, according to some estimates, if the country reached its emissions goal, which would risk upending the nation’s long-term LNG export aspirations.

[…]

Many will still hope that Britain can become Singapore-on-Thames, with a radically low-tax, deregulated economy. But we need a dose of realism, and who knew it could come from ultra-liberal, woke Canada. 

We certainly wouldn’t want to mirror all the country’s policies – it has a corporation tax rate of 38pc, for a start (although there is a 10pc rebate on income earned in Canadian provinces). 

But we could stop posing and start drilling: in 2013 the British Geological Survey estimated that the Bowland, a thick seam of shale across Lancashire and Yorkshire, could alone yield up to 13,000 billion cubic metres of natural gas. 

Had we extracted just 10pc, we could have heated homes for around half a century. Instead of relying on expensive imports and driving up bills, we could frack. And we could do that by pointing to Trudeau’s Canada. 

The only thing worse than a wokebag soft-dictatorship may be the same hiding in a “Conservative” skinsuit. Sunak’s heart seems to be in the right place about some things, but he’s very much a product of the transnational oligarchic collectivist “blob” in others.

Biden “admits” selling state secrets; What if extreme wokebaggery is actually a… distraction from economic incompetence?

(a) Behold the leader of the free world, in front of Indian PM Narendra Modi (via “Bonchie”):

(b) which brings me to the headline of today’s post. Jeff Charles on RedState VIP (behind a paywall) decries how such US GOP candidates as Ron DeSantis and Vivek Ramaswamy “double down on [anti-]woke” while only Trump is talking about the shambolic economy. [And, may I add, the dementia patient-in-chief.]

With the GOP presidential primaries heating up, many of those vying for the nomination have gone this route, betting that the backlash against the hard left’s fixation with pushing its ideology on the rest of us will help them garner enough support to win the White House.

Recently, Fox News host Laura Ingraham posted a tweet responding to an article about former President Donald Trump’s criticism of the electric vehicle industry.

“Biden is a catastrophe for Michigan and his environmental extremism is heartless and disloyal and horrible for the American worker and you’re starting to see it,” Trump said in front of a crowd at the Oakland County Republicans in Michigan.

“Driven by his ridiculous regulations, electric cars will kill more than half of U.S. auto jobs and decimate the suppliers that they decimated already — decimate the suppliers, and it’s going to decimate your jobs and it’s going to decimate more than anybody else, the state of Michigan,” he continued. “It is going to be decimation. It’s going to be at a level that that people can’t even imagine.”

Ingraham posited an important question: “Why don’t other Republicans talk about jobs like this? The top issues are inflation and economy—not ‘woke’-ism.”

He goes on to quote Pew polls having 75% saying the economy should be the top priority.

Of course, as pointed out in the comments, there is an issue where economy and wokebaggery intersect — “green [hell]” policies.

But it does raise a tantalizing possibility. What if the White House[‘s puppeteers’] doubling down on wokebaggery is not merely pandering to the hard left — but a calculated attempt to change the subject from the awful economy and inflation — not to mention the corrupt, senile doddering fool Abu Hunter trying to regain the White House — by goading conservatives into reacting against one awful wokebaggery against another?

Not 100% sold on the idea — it reeks a little too much of Francis Bacon’s “first idol of the mind” — assuming more order in reality than there really is. (This is the fundamental error of all conspiracy theorists.) There are multiple forces at work here, each with their own dynamic. But I would not put it past the spinmeisters to play up that angle.

Though it may well be that they overplayed their hand here. Even the most (morally) liberal and happy-go-lucky people who couldn’t care less what any consenting adults do with each other or choose to identify as is taken aback when the subject changes to children. Consider here a recent Gallup poll showing a 7% drop (from 71 to 64%) in the number of people who consider same-sex relationships morally acceptable — Douglas Murray (himself overtly homosexual) and many others have pointed out that the “inflection point” just “happens” to be temporally related to the recent push of gender ideology on children.

Telegraph: Prigozhin stood down because of threats to families of himself and associates; Col. Richard Kemp weighs in

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/06/25/yevgeny-prigozhin-moscow-advance-putin-threat-wagner-family/ (paywalled; cached copy)

Russian intelligence services threatened to harm the families of Wagner leaders before Yevgeny Prigozhin called off his advance on Moscow, according to UK security sources.

It has also been assessed that the mercenary force had only 8,000 fighters rather than the 25,000 claimed and faced likely defeat in any attempt to take the Russian capital.

Vladimir Putin will now try to assimilate Wagner Group soldiers into the Russian military and take out its former leaders, according to insights shared with The Telegraph.

The analysis offers clues into the mystery of why Prigozhin, the Wagner Group leader, called off his mutinous march on Moscow on Saturday just hours before reaching the capital.

But longtime commentator Col. Richard Kemp adds:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/25/putins-downfall-is-only-delayed-its-coming/ (paywalled; cached copy)

[Putin] was having enough trouble on the Ukrainian front, with an enemy that refused to buckle, backed by unexpectedly obdurate allies. His own army has been exposed to the world as a rotting façade rendered inadequate by decades of complacency and corruption.

Prigozhin’s abortive coup d’etat has now opened up a home front that has similarly exposed the regime’s weakness and the vulnerability of the country’s internal security. Prigozhin was able to seize and hold Moscow’s command centre for the entire Ukraine war without a shot being fired. His heavily armed mercenaries could then advance hundreds of miles towards Moscow, largely unmolested, and with reports of Russian soldiers surrendering in their path. On the way to Moscow, Wagner forces reportedly shot down seven helicopters and a transport plane – if true, one of the deadliest days for the Russian air force since the war in Ukraine began.

[…] As we have seen so often in Ukraine, Russian forces are unable to respond to unexpected crises without orders from above. This helps explain why Prigozhin’s men could get as far as they did. That those stop orders were not forthcoming exposes Putin’s weakness. His desperation to avoid violent clashes between Russian soldiers and Wagner mercenaries led to paralysis in the Kremlin accompanied by a frantic search for a way to shut Prigozhin down without bloodshed, eventually pressing Belarus’s Lukashenko into action. It’s not likely Putin cared about casualties on either side, but he did care about the potential disintegration at the front line caused by violent insurrection on the streets of Moscow or the roads leading to it. His address to the nation comparing this uprising to the collapse at the front in 1917 revealed his inner fears.

Putin brought all this upon himself, most significantly by his ill-judged invasion and an inability to take effective action when it all started to go wrong. But also by his Machiavellian divide-and-rule policy[*] that allowed the convicted criminal Prigozhin [who just happens to be a longtime Putin crony — N.A.] to build a powerful private army.

[…]

Putin’s ill-judgment can surely only be explained by the psychological toll of an unwinnable war taken on a man hitherto thought of by many as a political and strategic genius.

That aura has now vanished. Along with it, the reputation of an iron leader who cannot be crossed has gone, as he pardons the Wagner insurrectionists and, for the time being at least, allows their humiliated leader to scurry off into exile in Belarus.

The many Kremlin watchers who until now believed Putin was beyond any internal challenge have been proved wrong. Prigozhin may have left the stage, but his actions have exposed Putin as a mere mortal. The Moscow elites, who have for decades depended on strong leadership, are now watching a regime falling to pieces. Calculations of self-preservation will have taken over from fear and respect for an infallible leader who brought them stability. Some have been hedging their bets with their own private armies.

The latter is a reference to, among others, Gazprom, who have been recruited their own militia — ostensibly to guard their assets in the event all goes to hell.

Many have prematurely eulogized Vlad the Invader — a survival artist for sure. And whoever might replace him may well turn out to be even worse. But what happened represents a qualitative, not merely quantitative change. A difference not merely in degree, but in kind.

ADDENDUM: Mrs. Arbel is kind-of amused that Prigozhin would have been surprised about his family being targeted. I suspect there is stuff we are not being told: presumably he (and the others) had Wagnerite goons (in uniform or mufti) assigned as protection detail, but perhaps some of them were made “Sicilian offers you can’t refuse” made by the Putinites.

I do still wonder, though, in Ed Morrissey’s speculation (covered here yesterday) that this is some sort of rigged game aimed at giving Putin a pretext for extricating himself from the Ukrainian quagmire and shifting the blame for the fiasco to Defense Minister Shoigu and CoG Gerasimov.

Also, an article in the Jerusalem Post looks at possible security implications for Israel. particularly vis-à-vis Iran.

IN OTHER NEWS: in the Greek runoff elections, the conservative Nea Demokratia of PM Mitsotakis secured a clear victory.

Coup-us interruptus in Russia: Belarus brokered deal between Putin and Prigozhin

[Cartoon from the Daily Telegraph. Fair use under Israeli copyright law.]

So yesterday, during the Sabbath, Putin erstwhile chef and caterer, turned mercenary army boss, Yevgeny Prigozhin [no relation to the chemistry Nobel Laureate Ilya Prigogine z”l] set his “Wagner Group” on a march to Moscow — in a scene that reminds me of the history of Plantagenet-era England. Now, “Captain Ed” reports, it turns out to be “coup-us interruptus”: Belarus dictator Lukashenko brokered a compromise, and offered Prigogine asylum.

“Negotiations continued throughout the day. As a result, they came to agreements on the inadmissibility of unleashing a bloody massacre on the territory of Russia,” Lukashenko’s press service announced, per a Ukrainian Pravda translation. “At the moment, there is an absolutely profitable and acceptable option on the table for resolving the situation, with security guarantees for Wagner PMC fighters.”

The boast was met with skepticism abroad.

“Lukashenko is no one — he can not offer anything and he can not protect anyone against [Putin],” a second senior European official told the Washington Examiner. “If it is played out like that, then this is theater. If Prigozhin will live, it is theater.”

Yes, indeed. If that’s on the level, then Prigozhin is an idiot. Putin doesn’t allow dissidents to stay free, especially not those who raise up an army against him. There are no such things with Putin as “security guarantees.” Either Putin and Prigozhin cooked this up as a way to make an excuse to exit Ukraine while blaming the whole mess on [Defense Minister Sergei] Shoigu and others in the oligarchical circle, or Prigozhin and his lieutenants are dead men walking.

I personally lean toward the explanation I highlighted above.

The Daily Telegraph has extensive coverage:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/06/24/wagner-group-mutineers-call-off-attempt-topple-putin/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/24/vladimir-putin-yevgeny-prigozhin-bites-russia-coup-wagner/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/06/24/putin-betrayal-russia-coup-armed-mutiny-wagner-prigozhin/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/24/russia-verge-collapse-elites-try-escape-wagner-coup/

A couple of nuggets distilled from the above:

  • Note that Prigozhin and others have been railing against “incompetent” Shoigu and [Chief of the General Staff] Gerasimov for months — while even subtle opposition to the war or direct attacks against Putin will land you in jail in Putinstan, criticism that the war doesn’t go far enough coupled with blaming Putin’s underlings appears to be tolerated as long as it is politically useful. Yesterday, however, Prigozhin changed his tune in that he directly questioned the rationale for the “special military operation” itself.
  • In an amusing aside, Russian state TV apparently broadcast a programme about caviar to avoid covering Prigozhin’s march on Moscow — the way they had “Swan Lake” on repeat during the 1991 coup attempt.
  • Putin called Kazakhstan’s leader for assistance — who responded that it was “an internal Russian matter” and declined to get involved.

Let me highlight this analysis piece:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/06/24/called-off-or-not-prigozhin-coup-has-changed-russia-future/

Rather than Russia somehow returning to “normal” the coup has confirmed the country in the image of the puppet Donetsk and Luhansk people’s republics in occupied Ukraine, where warlords, mercenaries and mass mobilisation rule. The attempted overthrow of the state has shown that our lingering assumptions about what we have long called Putin’s Russia need to be re-assessed. Power abhors a vacuum and it was only for so long that the weirdness of Putin’s semi-isolation in the Kremlin would go unchallenged by men on the front line like Prigozhin.

Indeed, the coup marks the definitive turn of a page in Russian history: from an era of oligarchs such as Roman Abramovich, still a lingering presence at the start of the invasion, to the era of warlords with private armies, like Prigozhin. Their numbers have mushroomed since the assault on Kyiv and now include battalions linked to the Russian energy giant Gazprom.

[…] however things play out now, Prigozhin has killed the Putin myth. The idea that in domestic matters everything is controlled or manipulated by the man in the Kremlin. That his intelligence can see any plot or that anyone who defies him will find himself dead in 24 hours. The Russian president now looks confused, shaken and crucially stupid. Prigozhin had been issuing bloodcurdling verbal attacks on the general staff for months. Was it not Putin himself that let him become a celebrity with Wagner appearing even on billboards?

Russia’s future will now be shaped not by a myth of a stab in the back. Putin’s old story of the war has broken. Though the Kremlin may have ordered Russian search engines and social media giants to block search results for Prigozhin and Wagner and called for his arrest on state-controlled propaganda channels, the news of the rebellion has already travelled up and down the front lines by telegram and in the trenches, by word of mouth. So have Prigozhin’s claims: that the war is a failure, Ukraine was never going to attack Russia with the whole Nato bloc behind it and that over 100,000 Russian soldiers have died. The war, according to Prigozhin, was in fact initiated by the oligarchs to profiteer from it. The Kremlin’s narratives, at home or abroad, will never recover from one of its loudest voices –  the master of hundreds of its most powerful social media accounts – turning on it so spectacularly.

Western diplomats believe the future will also see Putin weakened internationally. Russia and the Russian president, to the consternation of Western foreign ministries, had over the last year built up an image of themselves as grindingly resisting an all-out proxy war from the West as they called on others to join them in providing tacit or overt support to their rebellion against Washington. But now, Vladimir Putin, instead of looking like a warrior in front of Xi Jinping, looks like a liability who cannot help his country and may in fact, be hastening its geopolitical demise. Kazakhstan, where on the eve of the war in Ukraine, the Kremlin dispatched troops to help the government quell unrest, chose to broadcast it had refused Putin’s requests for support. Others will follow in mocking this not so-strongman.

[…] for decades Putin has succeeded as a politician but failed to build a modern state. Ruling by, with and tolerating baroque corruption. Abhorring structures and institutions, which this kleptocracy undermined, Putin always chose to reward ad hoc loyalists and workarounds, like the Wagner Group.

That this contradiction could not last forever was the thesis of my first book Fragile Empire. The result was the Russian army went into war based on comically absurdist plans drawn up to please one man reliant on covert ops and military units hollow from corruption. Prigozhin, who, unlike Putin, ran a real dictatorial tight-ship, sensed his chance. “That’s why we are the patriots,” he said, snarling in fatigues, after entering Rostov, “and the ones who oppose us today are those who have rallied around scum. Because we do not want the country to continue living in corruption, deception and bureaucracy.”  This still remains the case. […]

The mutiny has dramatically weakened Putin and his war effort. As it stands, the old Putin system, where the man insiders called the Tsar fought and stole under his leadership, as he occasionally poisoned a journalist or an opposition leader is over. Over the next 48 hours Putin may come to some sort of uneasy truce with his one-time caterer, but the result in the long-term will be a fundamental rebalancing of power away from him. He may still sit in the Kremlin in a year’s time, but the era when he was the only thing that mattered in Russia is over. Prigozhin buried it, whatever happens next. […]

It is not a sad and scary future which awaits the Russian people – that is already their present.

Sabbath musical delight: Genesis, “Can-Utility And The Coastliners”

This is an old Genesis track, from their fourth album “Foxtrot” where it somewhat has been overshadowed by classics like the thunderous “Watcher Of The Skies” and the seven-part epic, “Supper’s Ready”.

The song is inspired by the famous tale of King Canute who ruled over a “North Sea Empire” spanning England, Denmark, and Norway. He supposedly issued a law forbidding the tides from rising — and famously failed. In the song, he placed himself in the path of the tides, and they of course drowned him — a timeless metaphor for overreaching rulers and ruling classes being brought down by their own overreach and denial of objective reality. (Sadly, this has never been more relevant than today.)

In real life, of course, he did not drown. There is another version of the tale where he issued this law as an object lesson to his court: that even his power, as an absolute ruler, had practical limit.

Here is the original song, from the Genesis official channel:

Here is bootleg audio of a 1972 live performance:

And here is a quarantine-era recreation (with video) by Italian tribute band “The Watch” (Gabriel-era Genesis was IMMENSE in Italy):

Have a nice weekend and Shabbat Shalom!

1848: The year of failed revolutions that yet changed the world

… Including the USA, where it drove a mass immigration of Germans (including the first major Jewish immigration wave — to be dwarfed in the 1880s by the one from Tsarist Russia).

What drove these revolutions? Yes, unrequited liberal and/or nationalist aspirations. Also, 1848 marked the emergence of socia

What triggered them all going off at the same time? A wave of bad harvests (plus the potato blight, which caused a devastating famine in Ireland):

In the years 1845 and 1846, a potato blight caused a subsistence crisis in Northern Europe, and encouraged the raiding of manorial potato stocks in Silesia in 1847. The effects of the blight were most severely manifested in the Great Irish Famine,[15] but also caused famine-like conditions in the Scottish Highlands and throughout continental Europe. Harvests of rye in the Rhineland were 20% of previous levels, while the Czech potato harvest was reduced by half.[16] These reduced harvests were accompanied by a steep rise in prices (the cost of wheat more than doubled in France and Habsburg Italy). There were 400 French food riots from 1846 to 1847, while German socio-economic protests increased from 28 from 1830 to 1839, to 103 from 1840 to 1847.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutions_of_1848

Lots and lots to unpack in this concise video.

Have a nice weekend and shabbat shalom!

ADDENDUM: Glenn Reynolds on the latest attacks on SCOTUS for standing in the way of the Anointed and its designated clients: We are being lectured on ethics by scoundrels. Evaluate accordingly.

Also seen on the net (paraphrasing from memory): The US has not a two-tier, but a three-tier justice system. One for the oligarchy; another for its aspirational members and handmaidens; and the third for the rest of us. Or rephrasing in Orwellian terms: one for the Inner Party; another for the Outer Party; the third for the Proles.

Summer solstice, criminal minds edition

(a) So while Trump gets indicted on one trumped-up charge after another, Hunter Biden (he of the gonzo pr0n laptop and “ten percent for the big guy”) gets a slap on the wrist — or more like a gentle tap on the wrist — in a plea bargain. Powerline weighs in with “six theses”.

(b) Meanwhile, did a Blackrock Capital recruiter speak the quiet part out loud to a prospective employee, who just happens to be an undercover reporter for OMG (O’Keeffe Media Group, his new venture after Project Veritas saw fit to dismiss him — its own founder):

The loose-lipped recruiter, Serge Varlay, doesn’t seem to care that he is vomitously spilling his guts to a woman who — at one point — he accuses of being an undercover reporter.

“The whole thing of, like, domination as a concept. It’s so f***ing interesting,” he says at one point.

The video of Varlay appears to have been shot in several locations.

“Let me tell you. It’s not who the president is. It’s who’s controlling the wallet of the president,” Varlay declares.

“And who’s that?” the OMG undercover honeypot responds.

“The hedge funds, BlackRock, the banks,” Varlay shoots back. “These guys run the world.”

Varlay says what a lot of us have long suspected: that U.S. politicians are for sale.

“Obviously, we have the system in place. First, there’s the senators. These guys are f***ing cheap. You got ten grand? You can buy a senator,” Varlay states confidently.

After a cut in the tape, Varlay continues by stating, “I could give you $500k right now, no questions asked. Are you gonna do what needs to be done?”

“Does, like, everybody do that?” the undercover reporter asks. “Does BlackRock do that?”

“Everybody does that,” Varlay responds. “It doesn’t matter who wins. They’re in my pocket at this point.”

Or did the recruiter realize he was speaking to an undercover and decide to “take the p*ss”?

I cannot help being reminded by both stories of this hit song by British-born Canadian singer-pianist [Lawrence] Gowan (presently the replacement front man for Styx). The opening hook with its C minor add9 arpeggio is as unusual for a vocal melody — it’s the sort of thing an Eddie Jobson or a Rick Wakeman would write on a synthesizer — as it is catchy.

I stand accused before you
I have no tears to cry
And you will never break me
‘Till the day I die

[…]

Before you hand me over
Before you read my sentence
I’d like to say a few words
Here in my own defense
Some people struggle daily
They struggle with their conscience ’till the end
I have no guilt to haunt me
I feel no wrong intent

A criminal mind
Is all II’ve ever known
Don’t try to reform me
‘Cause I’m made of cold stone

My criminal mind
Is all I’ve ever had
Ask one who’s known me
If I’m really so bad

— I am!

Jumping The Shark edition: Biden, Netanyahu and ACLU

The judicial reform debate is back in the news in Israel, as Netanyahu struggles to control the far-“right” tiger he rode to power. While he is infinitely more in possession of his faculties than Zhou Bi-Den — I agree with Rita Panahi that Abu Hunter belongs in a nursing home, not the White House —

Bibi is now stuck between a rock and a hard place as he’s desperately trying to stay in office while trying to control the more deranged elements of his coalition. If I were (G-d forbid) in Netanyahu’s place, I would long ago have retired rather than risk undoing my entire legacy. (Not to mention: I would probably prefer sitting in prison if it meant having some peace from Sarah Netanyahu.)

Speaking of which, their eldest son Yahir Meturlalhu [freely: arrogant nutcase], er, Yair Netanyahu has apparently left the country for parts unknown.

A few related stories:

(a) Following last week’s fiasco, where opposition candidate Karin Elharrar was elected to the Judicial Appointments Committee with apparently at least four “defector” votes from the coalition, YNet (in Hebrew) reports that a proposal banning secret Knesset votes has been submitted. Oh puh-leeze.

(b) Justice Minister Yariv-One-Note Levin and his pet poodle No-Simcha Rottenman are still hell-bent on ramming through their entire maximalist judicial castr… er, “reform” package. To my surprise, none other than their bête noire, former Chief Justice Aharon “everything is judgable” Barak, now pronounces himself open to a compromise which would curb the Supreme Court’s ability to use the grounds of “unreasonableness” to nix legislation and appointments, plus expand the number of lower-court judges (in an attempt to address the chronic backlog of our court system) in exchange for dropping the more radical parts of the reform. Protest leader Shikma Bressler (a particle physicist of note in her day job) may wonder if, when the very architect of the activist court is being more, er, reasonable than her, she hasn’t jumped the shark.

(c) But all the shark-jumpers in Israel have nothing on the American Civil Liberties Union, a once-respected organization that has now become a complete laughable shill for every latest looney illiberal left fad. Decrying that somebody was denied “gender reassignment” before execution… while inconveniently forgetting to mention what he was sentenced to death for

Owen was found guilty in the brutal killings of a 14-year old babysitter, Karen Slattery of Boynton Beach, and a 38-year-old executive secretary and single mother of two, Georgianna Worden, of Boca Raton.

Slattery, babysitting a 7-year-old and a 3-year-old at a house in Delray Beach, was stabbed 18 times and raped on March 24, 1984. About two months later, on May 29, Owen raped and bludgeoned Worden to death with a hammer.

Owen, convicted and sentenced to death in both murders, was granted a new trial in the Slattery killing when he claimed he was looking for hormones so he could become a woman. A second jury again convicted him and sentenced him to death.

ACLU has gone way beyond jumping the shark — sharks are jumping them.

ADDENDUM: whatever the [bleep] happened to Fox News?

ADDENDUM 2: Harry the Spare Tosspot and Me-Again Markle had their Spotify gig canceled.

And the “we must be more like Europe” US “liberals” are now definitely “The Fonz over the shark” as Scandinavian countries and the UK turn their back on “g*nder affirming” “care” for minors.

Sabbath musical delight: Beethoven, 1st Symphony (Berlin Philharmonic, 1962; remastered 2023)

Beethoven wrote his 1st symphony at the age of about 25 (it was published six years later, in 1801). Dedicated to his early patron, the Dutch-born Austrian diplomat Gottfried Freiherr [=Baron] von Swieten, it still pays tribute to Mozart and Haydn (themselves sponsored by von Swieten in earlier times) but is also unmistakably

There are many great recordings of Beethoven’s symphonies, but the one I grew up with and still have a very soft spot for was Herbert von Karajan’s 1962 cycle with the Berlin Philharmonic. Karajan isn’t to everyone’s taste — and I myself avoid his Bach recordings, which sound Beethovenian at the expense of clarity — but he was a past master at getting a powerful, expressive sound from his orchestra, and stylistically he and Beethoven were (to my ears) a match made in heaven.

The recordings were analog, of course: Karajan would record a total of four Beethoven symphony cycles (1951-55, 1961-2, 1975-6 [which won a Grammy], and digitally 1982-4). The 1962 is not the squeaky-cleanest recording from an acoustic point of view, but Karajan was at the peak of his powers. Very recently, somebody remastered it, and the results seem to further enhance the already stellar performance.

1st movement, Adagio molto then Allegro con brio:

2nd movement: Andante cantabile con moto

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyVhFiDX_AZdmxVT5-vGLxw

3rd movement: Minuet

4th movement: Finale

Enjoy, have a nice weekend, and Shabbat shalom

Trivia: Karajan was of Greek ancestry: his great-grandfather was named Georgios Karagiannis (Γεώργιος Καραγιάννης) — the surname is pronounced Karayannis (in German transliteration: Karajannis) in modern (Demotic) Greek.

Galactic quarantine

I had an encounter yesterday night with a being that seemed human, yet behaved like a stranger to our ways. It told me the following story that expains why aliens no longer visit us. This is a rough, unedited transcript.

GALACTIC QUARANTINE

‘Gentlebeings, the special ad-hoc committee on the issue of Fros 640.3 is now in session,’ intoned Seniormost Counselor Yort.

‘Motion to the chair: to accelerate discussion, let us refer to the planet by the name the natives give it,’ spoke Junior Councelor Reknip.

‘Motion seconded,’ added Senior counselor Daas.

‘Right,’ spoke the chair, “Earth it is. Gentlebeings: I would not have called the meeting on such short notice if the issue weren’t grave. Reknip, you have the floor.”

“Thank you, chair.” A holographic representation of a bipedal, mostly hairless, being filled the air. “This is the intelligent species that inhabits Earth. Let me show you some footage of a thousand revolutions ago of their planet around their sun.”

It showed an edifice built of stone, attacked by hundreds of those beings clad in metal and leather, and defended by hundreds more. The weapons being wielded were primitive: sharp metal tools, smaller tools being launched through the air by a tensed cord of sorts; also, the defenders were pouring out cauldrons of some hot or caustic liquid on the attackers. In the background, some of the latter were moving around seated on four-legged creatures.

“Cute, but not very interesting,” came one reaction.

The images switched to the aftermath of the conquest. Clearly, the beings reproduced sexually, and now both sexes were in sight. The one similar to the defenser were being put to death in various gruesome ways, while the latter were being forced to submit to reproductive acts. A collective wave of nausea wafted through the room.

“These beings clearly are extremely warlike and appallingly cruel,” came another. “But surely it will take tens of thousands of their… revolutions to develop more serious weapons.”

“So we would have thought. The following images are from a thousand revolutions later — in the middle of the year 1943, according to the Earthlings’ reckoning.”

The images showed two enormous armies in battle with each other — sitting in mechanized armored land-cruisers. One side fought under a plain red banner with some symbol in yellow in the corner, the other under a red flag with a white circle and inside a large black insignia of some sort. Foot soldiers fought with the land-cruisers, and threw or fired primitive chemical explosives at the others. The land cruisers’ main armament fired projectiles at each other, while the secondary armament — some sort of small-caliber autocannon — fired at the foot soldiers.”

“What propulsion systerm?”

“Internal combustion engine powered by liquid hydrocarbons. Crude but effective.”

Shock went through the room. It had taken their most warlike race forty times longer to make the same technological development, and half as long again to develop primitive space travel.

The images now shifted to a facility where guards herded a few thousand beings into a small chamber, which was then filled with a toxic gas, after which the dead were disposed of through combustion.

“Spirit of the Universe, why?”

“The group doing the herding considered the herded group a plague that needed to be exterminated.”

“How long did this go on.”

“For several of their years. We estimate the toll from this — and other — facilities to be several million. But that isn’t all. A mere two — two! — of their revolutions later.”

The image changed again. Thousands of primitive flying cruisers dropped objects on a large city, which was then set ablaze.

“And that was only one city of several. Now just half a revolution later.”

A single flying cruiser hovered high over an equally large city. A single pod dropped from it. Just before it reached ground level, the hologram went blindingly bright. The image zoomed out, and the unmistakable cloud shape associated with a fission explosion grew above the city.

“Almost as many Earthlings were killed at this place they call ‘Hiroshima’ as in the previous place, which they call ‘Tokyo’.”

Now everyone was gasping, or its equivalent for different life forms.

“You realize the seriousness of the matter? We have a very warlike life form in a blindingly fast, and accelerating, stage of technological development.”

“But sure they will never get off this planet…”

“I have a surprise for you.”

These images were more placid, of the surface of a celestial body that unmistakably had noatmosphere. A conveyance landed on it, and two life forms in protective suits exited it. One of them planted an insignia with stripes and stars on the surface of the moon.

“In their year 1969. Sure, it was just their planet’s only moon, and they traveled on a primitive chemical rocket, but…”

After a pregnant pause, Reknip continued. “According to our extrapolations, they will develop interstellar travel no later than by the year 2100 of their reckoning.”

In the blink of an eye hence, by galactic standards.

“But will they want to?” asked Daas.

“We believe population pressure and resource depletion will force them to at least colonize the rest of their solar system.”

“What is their population?”

“It is growing and approaching Earth’s carrying capacity, but with rational resource management and more efficient technology, the planet can probably bear another four times as many. Especially if they start harvesting mineral across their solar system.”

“Any other inhabitable planets for their physiology in it?”

“If you mean without artificial biospheres, no. The fourth planet is promising for adaptation though.”

“They have to be contained until they can be civilized to Galactic standards – or we will need to invoke General Directive 430.”

A collective shudder — or its equivalents — went through the room. GD 430 concerned the wholesale extermination of another life form. It had last been implemented forty thousand Earth years ago — by inducing the star around which the offending life form’s planet rotated to go nova. Literally anything would be better than a repeat performance.

“So what do you propose to do?”

“Curbing population growth would be a great start. Less population pressure, and they won’t be as keen to get off their planet.”

“I have a plan,” spoke up Tluacuof. “Implant a belief in them that mating in the reproductive orifice is sinful, and other orifices are sacred.”

“A good start, but there is a more comprehensive solution”, spoke Senior counselor Icsmarg. “My team spared time nor expense to develop a mind virus that we believe to be an answer to the situation. If the Chair permits—”

“Permission granted.”

And thus Icsmarg laid out his plan.

About thirty Earth-years later.

“The follow-up meeting of the Special Committee on Fros 1024.3, otherwise known as “Earth”, is now in session,” spoke Seniormost Counselor Yort. “As you recall, we authorized Senior Counselor Icsmarg to introduce the mind virus called ‘pomo’. Let us now review the results. Reknip, you have the floor.”

Again, three-dimensional images filled the space. An orator was ranting:

“We must decolonize science! Math is a tool of the white patriarchy! Other ways of knowing…”

Mirth in the conference room. “Good luck developing interstellar travel that way.”

“Or even staying alive.”

Another clip had a disheveled-looking musician of sorts producing sounds while whining about his desire to be ‘rape’d, ‘used’, and ‘waste’d.

“There is a logical contradiction here. He wants to be, er, ‘possessed’ against his will?”

“That’s the effect of this virus for you. It erodes the capacity for coherent thought.”

Next, juveniles at an educational institution were explained there were not two genders, but no fewer than one hundred and thirty-seven.

“Why?”

“That way, they are less likely to reproduce and population will drop.”

The next device showed images extracted from the personal computing device of the heir to the leader of the most powerful nation. It showed the heir, naked, in the process of ingesting illicit neuroactive chemicals, in various acts with equally naked females, and bragging about bribes he had extracted on behalf of his progenitor.

Counselor Volyrk was not easily shocked, but most taken aback that the Earthlings had gone from primitive mechanical calculating devices to this technology in so short a time span.

“Do the Earthlings know this?”

“Yes.”

“How come this leader and his offspring are still in power?”

“Oh, they are not really — we are controlling them indirectly. They are in thrall to the leader of the most populous nation — and him we have suborned.”

“And the Earthlings are not rising in revolt?”

“Half of his nation want him gone, but the other half think they will not be able to kill their offspring during gestation if his opponent comes to power.”

“We would want them to do that, of course. Keep population pressure down.”

Next came images of a demonstration demanding that various technologies be given up to stop “global warming”. One of the demonstrations was led by a juvenile who seemed mentally the worse for wear.

“Are we controlling her?”

[…]

“So our plan is working.”

“The mind virus is effective — that’s the good news. The bad news is: see here. Junior Scout Sateg was sent on a reconnaissance mission, disguised as one of the locals. This is footage from his debriefing.”

The Galactic went on an excited discourse “… reality is only an illusion! There is no objective truth, only narratives fighting for power! Infinite different genders! Galactic reparations payments now! Gravity is a social construct…”

“We tried to treat him, but then he infected others of the treatment crew. We had no choice but to place them in complete biocontainment and cut off communications — otherwise we’d have had to euthanize them.”

Shock turned to horror. This ‘pomovirus’ was a Doomsday weapon that could destroy all of Galactic civilization.

“There’s nothing for it. Convene the Supreme Galactic Council and request authorization to implement Directive 430.”

“No! Not xenocide. I beg you — there must be an antidote!”

“That will take hundreds of their years to develop.”

“If they don’t extinguish themselves by then.”

“It’s quite possible that those most resilient to the virus will reproduce most — and hence become the dominant population.”

“So we must give them a chance. In the meantime, let’s place them in Galactic quarantine.”

“How?”

“The standard procedure. Surround the system with a belt of warning buoys broadcasting a signal warning all spacecraft to avoid it, in Galactic Standard and in all major Galactic languages.”

Nods, grumbles, and other expressions of assent went across the room.

“I move for a vote.”

“Motion seconded.”

“Therefore, let us vote.”

The motion passed unanimously. Ever since, the planet the locals call Earth has been the Galactic equivalent of an isolation cell for the dangerous mentally ill.

One counselor was not around to witness it, however. Overcome with guilt, Icsmarg had disabled the safety interlocks of his personal spacecraft, boarded it, and piloted it into the heart of Earth’s sun.


The above is a work of satirical fiction. To paraphrase Heinrich Böll, similarity with actual events is neither coincidental nor intentional, but merely unavoidable.

Fields of discarded electric cars in China; Bill Gates meets Xi Jinping; 81 million votes my toches

I’ve been seeing aggressive marketing campaigns here for Chinese electric vehicles — SUVs often being priced competitively with (sub)compact Japanese, South Korean, or European sedans.

So I was surprised (then again, not) to see Chinese fields filled with tens of thousands of unsold electric cars in Winston Sterzel’s latest video.

TL;DR version: manufacturers get massive subsidies if they meet certain production quotas, which are much higher than actual demand — so, in order not to miss out on them, they overproduce and then dispose of the overproduction.

(b) Speaking of China and frauds: there is a Latin expression beginning with si augur augurem that translates to “when one soothsayer sees another, they both burst out laughing”. Idiomatically: con-men acknowledge each other. Thus Bill Gates will meet with Winnie the Flu. Soundtrack:

(c) and while we’re on the subject of massive frauds getting perpetrated, from selling a vaporware OS to IBM and then rebadging an actual OS bought on the cheap as one’s own development to the massive economic Potemkin village of Xi the Flu, here is a tune about another fraud on a similar scale.

Why only Germany adopted the Enigma system?

There is an old adage among IT people that a weak password is worse than none at all, since it gives people the illusion of privacy. Similarly, the weak ciphers that the Kaiser’s Germany were using during the Great War (as World War One was then called) caused it more harm than if they had communicated in cleartext: the British “Room 40” and its French counterpart cracked the German codes (variants on the Vigenère cipher) with comparative ease, and were able to exploit the decrypts to great effect — including in perhaps the biggest coup of all, the Zimmermann Telegram where the German Foreign Minister Arthur Z. Offered Mexico recovery of the formerly Mexican states of the USA as a reward for attacking the USA and entering the war on Germany’s side.

As Simon Singh relates in the relevant chapter of his popular book “The Code Book”, Germany’s direct telegraph cables had been cut by the British at the start of the war, so Germany sent the telegram to their ambassador in (still neutral) Washington via Sweden, encrypted by a system they deemed secure, for forwarding to his colleague in Mexico City. However, “Room 40” was able to decipher it, then the British told an agent who had infiltrated the telegraph office exactly which one of their spies in Mexico exactly which document to look for, and after finding the original presented it to the Americans. Outraged, Washington entered the war on the Allied side, and the rest is history.

(This is Simon Singh quoting Barbara Tuchman.)

Now near the end of the war, and in the early years afterward, at least four different inventors in four countries developed different variants of the same next-generation mechanized encryption system: Arthur Scherbius in Germany (who called it “Enigma”), Arvid Damm in Sweden, Alexander Koch (1919 patent 10,700) in the Netherlands, and Edward Hebern in the USA. Alas for the latter three, they couldn’t even give their system away: it was cost-prohibitive for the private sector, and in the post-WW I atmosphere of peace and supposed openness, governments were uninterested. US Secretary of State Henry Stimson even dissolved the US’s “Black Chamber” decryption office, saying “gentlemen don’t read each other’s mail”.

Germany kept looking for reasons why it lost, however. We all know how a Dolchstosslegende (“stab-in-the-back” legend) developed, and how a certain corporal [y”sh] of Austrian birth and his henchmen would exploit it, but there were also more sober people in the Reichswehr (the reduced Weimar-era armed forces) who were looking for more realistic answers. Then in 1923, two publications out of England contained the shocking revelation that their codes had been broken.

The first was Winston Churchill’s The World Crisis, published in 1923, which included a dramatic account of how the British had gained access to valuable German cryptographic material: At the beginning of September 1914, the German light cruiser Magdeburg was wrecked in the Baltic. The body of a drowned German under-officer was picked up by the Russians a few hours later, and clasped in his bosom by arms rigid in death, were the cipher and signal books of the German navy and the minutely squared maps of the North Sea and Heligoland Bight. On September 6 the Russian Naval Attaché came to see me. He had received a message from Petrograd telling him what had happened, and that the Russian Admiralty with the aid of the cipher and signal books had been able to decode portions at least of the German naval messages. The Russians felt that as the leading naval Power, the British Admiralty ought to have these books and charts. If we would send a vessel to Alexandrov, the Russian officers in charge of the books would bring them to England. This material had helped the cryptanalysts in Room 40 to crack Germany’s encrypted messages on a regular basis. Finally, almost a decade later, the Germans were made aware of this failure in their communications security. Also in 1923, the British Royal Navy published their official history of the First World War, which reiterated the fact that the interception and cryptanalysis of German communications had provided the Allies with a clear advantage. These proud achievements of British Intelligence were a stark condemnation of those responsible for German security, who then had to admit in their own report that, “the German fleet command, whose radio messages were intercepted and deciphered by the English, played so to speak with open cards against the British command.””

The Code Book: The Science of Secrecy from Ancient Egypt to Quantum Cryptography by Simon Singh
https://a.co/4ccijTQ

This acted like a cold shower to the Reichswehr, who quickly started looking for a more secure replacement — and found Scherbius’s “Enigma” ready for mass production. The rest is history.

Video: how to spot a woke corporation (satire?); Douglas Murray and Julie Bindel on the “alphabet clown car” and why they want no part of it

Got a very full plate at work today, so just a few videos of note.

(A) Stacey Lennox highlights a handy, satirical guide from Red Balloon on how to spot a “woke” [to LSD dreams] corporation or organization

(B) The Spectator hosts an enlightening discussion with Douglas Murray and Julie Bindel, both openly homosexual, on the LGBTQWERTYUIOP “community” — or as Murray calls it “the alphabet clown car” — and why they do not believe there is any such thing in reality, as the different “letters” have very different interests that often are intrinsically opposed. Murray quips about there being no two more different groups than A and G: “asexuals and gay men”. Julie Bindel, a veteran lesbian activist, speaks of the alphabet weaponization by a “T****-Taliban” of “misogynistic men” trying to push biological women out of their space. Both in fact agree that the T letter is at root “deeply homophobic” (see also this). And both decry attempts to expand the “alphabet clown car” to so-called “minor-attracted persons” (a.k.a., in British slang, “nonces”, referring to the supposed fate of child molesters who are placed in general prison population).

In related news, the UK has now followed Norway in banning puberty blocker hormone therapy, after already having shut down the Tavistock clinic engaged in surgical “reassignment” of minors. And Target Corporation appears to have lost $14 billion in market valuation. Meanwhile, the true newspaper of record, the Babylon Bee, reports Dylan Mulvaney is blackmailing corporations by threatening to endorse their products. (Yes, this is satire. But the world has become so insane that the line between satire and reality has become blurry.)

ADDENDUM: Northwestern U. Law School has morphed into an open-air mental institution so fast I didn’t notice. Cue: “In the depths of a mind insane…”

Sunday Times: yes, it was almost certainly a lab leak #COVID19

Via Powerline. What used to be suppressed on social media (at governments’ behest) as a “conspiracy theory” is now reported in all seriousness by one of the world’s most respected newspapers, not the New York Slimes but the original Times [of London].[*]

Here is the original (paywalled) Times [of London] article, and here is a cached copy. Some teasers:

Scientists in Wuhan working alongside the Chinese military were combining the world’s most deadly coronaviruses to create a new mutant virus just as the pandemic began.

Investigators who scrutinised top-secret intercepted communications and scientific research believe Chinese scientists were running a covert project of dangerous experiments, which caused a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and started the Covid-19 outbreak.

The US investigators say one of the reasons there is no published information on the work is because it was done in collaboration with researchers from the Chinese military, which was funding it and which, they say, was pursuing bioweapons.

The facility, which had started hunting the origins of the Sars virus in 2003, attracted US government funding through a New York-based charity whose president was a British-born and educated zoologist. America’s leading coronavirus scientist shared cutting-edge virus manipulation techniques.

The institute was engaged in increasingly risky experiments on coronaviruses it gathered from bat caves in southern China. Initially, it made its findings public and argued the associated risks were justified because the work might help science develop vaccines.

This changed in 2016 after researchers discovered a new type of coronavirus in a mineshaft in Mojiang in Yunnan province where people had died from symptoms similar to Sars.

Rather than warning the world, the Chinese authorities did not report the fatalities. The viruses found there are now recognised as the only members of Covid-19’s immediate family known to have been in existence pre-pandemic.

They were transported to the Wuhan institute and the work of its scientists became classified. “The trail of papers starts to go dark,” a US investigator said. “That’s exactly when the classified programme kicked off. My view is that the reason Mojiang was covered up was due to military secrecy related to [the army’s] pursuit of dual use capabilities in virological biological weapons and vaccines.”

According to the US investigators, the classified programme was to make the mineshaft viruses more infectious to humans.

They believe this led to the creation of the Covid-19 virus, and that it leaked into the city of Wuhan after a laboratory accident. “It has become increasingly clear that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was involved in the creation, promulgation and cover-up of the Covid-19 pandemic,” one of the investigators said.

Much, much, much more at the link — including why certain scientists were not at all interested in the truth becoming public. In particular the role of one Peter Daszak reminds me of what Judge Benjamin Halevy told Rudolf Kästner: “macharta et-nishmatekha la-Satan” (you sold your soul to the devil).

Go read the whole thing. If you prefer to hear something podcast style, here is an embed.

Infographic from the article embedded [fair use under Israeli copyright law]:

[*] The Times has been continuously published since 1785, at first as The Daily Universal Register, since January 1, 1788 under its current name. It is the second oldest one of the oldest continuously published daily dailies in English (after the Hartford Courant, est. 1764), and one of the oldest worldwide — the very oldest is the Swedish Post och Inrikes Tidningar (Post and Inland/Domestic Times, est. 1645). The Wiener Zeitung (Vienna Newspaper), est. 1703, seems to be more a gazette (government-issued official bulletin) rather than a newspaper proper. The oldest that still has a print run appears to be the Italian-language Gazzetta di Mantova (the Mantua Gazzette), est. 1664.

This list claims Lloyd’s List (est. 1734) as the oldest in English, but that is a shipping and marine insurance trade journal and not a general newspaper.

“Soros Of Puppets” hands down control of his empire to 37-year old son; Dr. John Campbell on the UK “counter-disinformation unit”

Jordan Schachtel: https://open.substack.com/pub/dossier/p/succession-soros-nepo-baby-takes

Alexander Soros appears to have never held a real job.

He spent most of his 20s and 30s as a partying New York socialite who was “working on his PhD.”

Since then, he has established “philanthropies” that use his father’s money to advance leftist causes.

A standard climate hoax hypocrite, Soros makes demands of others to lower their “carbon footprint,” while regularly traveling around the world via private jet and owning homes that he purchased with his father’s money in Berkeley, Manhattan, and throughout Europe.

Overall, I am incredibly bullish about this move.

According to the Harvard Business Review, some 70% of family-owned businesses fail or are sold before the second generation takes the reins. And only 10% of those businesses make it to the third generation. While George Soros’s vast properties are both businesses and “non-profits,” the same rules and odds generally apply to both types of institutions.

Advocates for human freedom should rejoice, and hope that the Alexander Soros wields complete control over Soros Inc, as that would be the fastest route to its demise.

Love him or hate him, the elder Soros undoubtedly possesses a brilliant financial and political activist oriented mind, having successfully established an NGO superpower that has fully integrated its large nefarious influence into the hearts of countless governments. Alex Soros, on the other hand, is merely a beneficiary of nepotism, and nothing more than a midwit, guilt-ridden leftist ideologue.

I don’t know about you, but I look forward to the swift collapse of Soros Inc under Alex’s watch.

“A consummation devoutly to be wished”.

(B) speaking of manipulative globalist toolmother”lovers”, Dr. John Campbell weighs in on recent revelations (mostly by the Daily Telegraph) about the “Orwellian” so-called “Counter-Disinformation Unit” of the UK government. By old-school British standards, the good doctor is quite livid.

Sabbath musical delight: The Band Geeks with special guest Jon Anderson, “An Evening of Yes Epics and Classics”

“The Band Geeks” is a long-standing project on YouTube of a group of musicians around bassist and guitarist Richie Castellano (presently with Blue Oyster Cult) who produce essentially note-perfect covers of classic and progressive rock tracks. When it comes to Yes covers, his wife (who’s an alto) actually would sing Jon Anderson’s lead vocals — this works, as Jon’s natural vocal range is basically a male alto (or a counter-tenor, if you like).

My favorite vocalist is of course Mrs. Arbel 🙂 but having said that, I could listen to Jon Anderson sing listings from the phone book and enjoy it. (Most other vocalists I most enjoy are radically different — they tend to be skilled and highly ‘present’ voice actors first and mellifluous singers second, like Peter Gabriel, Anders Broden of Sabaton, or Bruce Dickinson of Iron Maiden. Rush frontman Geddy Lee is a bit of a special case — the sound of his vocals with old Rush is an acquired taste, but his level of voice/bass guitar independence is simply mind-blowing, and Neil Peart (RIP)’s lyrics are of course peerless.)

Sketch my surprise when I heard that Jon Anderson had started touring with… The Band Geeks, presenting entire shows of classic Yes songs and epics.

https://richiecastellano.com/jonyesepic

Here’s a trailer/teaser:

And below is a full show in HD. Aside from the technique, professionalism, and respect for the original material displayed by the musicians, I frankly am blown away by how good Jon’s vocals sound given his advanced age (78 at the time of writing!). One can close one’s eyes and pretend one is listening to the actual Yes in their heyday. (They perform with two keyboardists so they can reproduce some of Rick Wakeman’s studio overdubs live.) The show begins about two minutes into the video.

And just to demonstrate this show wasn’t a fluke, here’s another full show, in fact the very first of the tour. The movie is in lower resolution, but the audience member filming it had a much closer seat:

Enjoy, have a nice weekend, and Shabbat shalom!