ClimateGate update: “follow the money” edition,

The latest episode in the ClimateGate soap opera:

  • ClimateGate, UK edition: “follow the money, all 4 trillion euro of it” . The figure refers to the IIGCC, which declares itself “a forum for collaboration on climate change for European investors. The group’s objective is to catalyse greater investment in a low carbon economy by bringing investors together to use their collective influence with companies, policymakers and investors. The group currently has over 50 members, including some of the largest pension funds and asset managers in Europe, and represents assets of around €4 trillion.” The Chairman of IIGCC? Peter Dunscombe, who also happens to be the BBC’s Head of Pensions Investment.
  • James Taranto: Hot enough for you?
  • Dallas, TX (!!) has all-time record snowfall of 1 foot in 24h. 200,000 people are without power. Did ManBearPig fly through DFW recently? Ironically, DFW has gone AWOL from GHCN temperature database?
  • In fact (H/t: Realwest): 49 out of 50 states report snow on the ground (the exception is of course Hawaii)
  • Earlier today we had the story that AGW skepticism has been declared “unpatriotic”. Blogging huskies surely approve.
  • Phil Jones admits climate data not well organized, says not certain medieval warm period was warmer than today. Which is progress from trying to “bury” it, I suppose…
  • Not-quite-unrelated story: Control freaks want to end blogger anonymity.
  • Henk Tennekes, former director of KNMI (the Dutch counterpart of NOAA) and member of the Royal Dutch Academy resigns in protest over ClimateGate-style monkey business. “”I don’t want to remain a member of an organization that …screws up science that badly.” Read the whole article (by Roger Pielke, Sr.) UPDATE: Tennekes’ farewell message, entitled “Hermetic Jargon”, can be read in its entirety here as well as at the Pielke link given above.
  • A history lesson: Continental drift — a cautionary tale about “scientific consensus”.
  • UPDATE: Leonard Evans, physicist and member of the National Academy of Engineering: “Has global warming got you snowed in?” Some choice quotes:

    Eventually the truth will out. When global warming finally is recognized as the world’s greatest political hoax, those discredited will not be the perpetrators.

    The perpetrators are politicians and traditional media. After the credibility bubble bursts, the same politicians and media will continue to influence what the public is told. They will effectively claim that they never misled anyone. The fall guy will be science.

    Lost in the confusion will be the distinction between science and the scientific community.

    The scientific community has largely abandoned science. It has degenerated into little more than just another lobbying group seeking advancement for its members.[…]

    The scientific community gets it right when the stakes are unimportant. It effectively opposed such anti-scientific nonsense as creationism. […] How starkly the vigorous opposition to creationism contrasts with the community’s near silence in response to the anti-scientific nonsense coming from the likes of Al Gore. Worse than silence, in all too many cases, the community has been an enthusiastic participant in an orgy of unreason. It has been an orgy lubricated by almost limitless opportunities to grab influence, physical resources and cool cash. […]

    It is easy to create the illusion of consensus when those who disagree are silenced.

    It is not known what the majority of scientists think about global warming, not that it matters all that much. Science is not about counting votes. However, I can offer an anecdotal observation.

    I am a scientist, while my wife is a professor of art history. Her colleagues generally think all scientists support Mr. Gore – after all, they have been so informed by such authoritative sources as the New York Times. My fellow doctorate-holding science colleagues generally share my conclusion: The claim that human activity has appreciably warmed our planet is the greatest political hoax ever.

    Many specific actions supported by global-warming alarmists are admirable. We ought to pollute less and transfer less wealth to Middle Eastern oil-producing tyrannies. These issues should be addressed on their merits. They have little to do with global temperature.

    To do sensible things for irrational reasons just validates irrationality. And who can tell what future horrors will be justified by irrationality?

    When the global-warming hoax eventually collapses, the victim will be science. When science suffers, we all suffer.

  • Updates to follow as they come in.

3 thoughts on “ClimateGate update: “follow the money” edition,

  1. i just know this page, nice blog you have,
    i will visit this web more often and read about your post,
    i like ur topic specially about
    The latest episode in the ClimateGate soap opera:


  2. i just know this page, nice blog you have,
    i will visit this web more often and read about your post,
    i like ur topic specially about
    The latest episode in the ClimateGate soap opera


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s